Who Wrote the Bible? – Judges, Explained

Who wrote the book of Judges?

Jewish tradition credits Samuel — prophet, judge, and kingmaker — with authoring Judges. Internal textual clues narrow the writing window to roughly 1050–1010 BC, fitting Samuel’s lifetime almost perfectly. Though some scholars argue for multiple authors or later editors, the evidence points remarkably close to one man.

---

Who Wrote the Bible? — Series 3

No kings, constant conflict, and a cast of characters you won’t forget. Welcome to Judges.

What even is the book of Judges?

After Joshua led Israel into the Promised Land, you’d expect things to settle down. They did not. The book of Judges covers a chaotic stretch of history where Israel had no king — just a rotating cast of leaders called judges, who kept getting called up to sort out whatever mess had broken out that decade. There’s war with neighbours, internal drama, and some genuinely wild storylines. It’s the most eventful era in early Israelite history.

Who wrote it?

Jewish tradition points to Samuel — judge, prophet, and the man who anointed Israel’s first kings. Not to be confused with Samuel L. Jackson, who is also iconic but less involved in ancient scripture.

But as always in this series, tradition is just the starting point. The real fun is in the clues the text leaves behind.

Judges 17:6	The phrase “in those days Israel had no king” appears multiple times — written in a way that looks back at the judge era as a past period. The author clearly lived during a time when kings already existed. Suggests it was written after the monarchy began, around 1050 BC or later.
Judges 1:21	The Jebusites are still described as living in Jerusalem alongside the Benjaminites. Since David conquered Jerusalem around 1010 BC, this passage must have been written before that happened. Sets an upper limit — written before 1010 BC.

The window this opens

Put both clues together and you get a surprisingly narrow window for when Judges was written:

That 40-year window fits Samuel almost perfectly. He was alive during the transition from judges to kings, had access to the oral and written records of the era, and had every reason to document what had just happened. The case for Samuel is genuinely strong.

But wait — there are other theories

Of course there are. Some scholars argue that Judges isn’t the work of a single author at all, but a compilation stitched together from multiple older sources — possibly during the Babylonian exile. Their evidence? The book’s style, language, and themes shift noticeably across different sections, suggesting more than one hand was at work over a longer period of time.

The verdict

The internal evidence is more specific here than with any book we’ve covered so far — and it points strongly toward Samuel. But “strongly” isn’t “certainly,” and the debate isn’t closed. What’s clear is that whoever wrote Judges had deep knowledge of a turbulent, complicated era, and they wanted future generations to understand exactly how Israel kept ending up in the same cycle of mess, rescue, and mess again.

Sound familiar?

>